Let's look at the benefits and drawbacks of rental and built-in donwload site
Let's consider the pros and cons of rental and built-in webhard.
Rental webharders include Dacom Webhard, Ucloud, and KT Webhard. This refers to a service that shares idc's server resources with other users.
Built-in webhard solutions include Internet disks, linkhard, plus disks, ncs, and Ajaxplar.
The rental type gets the advantage of having a server on idc, so that it does not have to be managed separately, and the initial setting cost is low.
However, you need to pay monthly maintenance for capacity and traffic, purchase capacity and traffic costs, and move files to other servers.
There are disadvantages such as dual subscription to internal services (homepages, intranet) along with other domains.
Built-in Webhard leverages specific hardware (internal resources) to create services, freeing up capacity and traffic.
It gets the burden of initial setting costs. p2p 순위 Large companies do not use rental solutions. Webhard is not only a Webhard, it's a company.
It is because it is confidential and knows the power of strategic sharing and well-managed data.
Link hard solutions have emerged in line with the intention that small and medium-sized businesses should build webhard without any burden.
It does not need to purchase H/W separately, and the solution alone allows users to build Webhard by utilizing the desired pc, NAS, and server equipment.
If you already had a website or intranet, it is possible to stop unnecessary work that used to run the site.
OK to create installed blogs or bulletin boards.
By increasing utilization through intranet, groupware, kms, and the business's homepage plus the Webhard's original function, the idea of developing a use-oriented product makes one anticipate the expansion of the solution.
The price can be from 300,000 won for 30 people, which can be fully built in Soho, so the parts which were agonizing over setting and maintenance costs will undoubtedly be solved a lot.
It is now necessary for Soho to determine a web hard system.
Rental vs. Construction.
Webhard reminds you of an extremely useful and convenient Internet service that allows you to download files over the Internet at a fixed monthly cost. Because of this the usage of web hard has become common.
But it's not just recently that this concept arrived, and it's true that it is been a long time. As soon as it came out, lots of people used it, and there were many office workers who didn't join it or even covered their personal expenses due to lack of capacity, and you can find probably still some now.
The biggest background of this phenomenon is the rapidly growing file capacity of materials such as for example work used, while there are many burdens and inconveniences to cover monthly expenses predicated on limited capacity. Furthermore, the service is provided against the backdrop of a big portal, which also results in security concerns concerning the leakage of confidential information, which explains why the company refuses to adopt it.
In some cases, there are also many implementations of SI projects that build installation-only webhard that meet the needs of users' needs. The deployment of a standalone server includes a server (HW)+ operating-system (Server OS)+ webhard solution (high-priced licenses using the number of users), that is prohibitive compared to using monthly webhard when maintenance services are included.
NAS offers a highly cost-effective, easy-to-install and easy-to-operate webhard for anybody with significantly decrease the needs of the webhard users. Webhard is quite innovative since it supports uploading files by default. It's a really good feature because DDNS, etc. could be accessed from the outside without having to buy an authorized IP.
Unfortunately, there are functional limitations because the basic webhard contained in these NAS is basic. As the word "basic" implies, it's not a webhard solution developed at a higher cost. Because of this, webhard modules for NAS mounts are recently available with the capabilities and peaks of expensive, built-in webhard solutions. Of course, it's a paid option, but it is a very low-cost, very helpful solution that's less than a tenth of the cost of building a single server.
Now, NAS and Webhard meet to integrate Intranet & Extranet at low cost, developing a small but powerful collaborative file server. I'll have a look at the rough features of Webhard and guide you. You can go over it and choose the best one according to the reality and needs.